Fresno State
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
284  Annemarie Schwanz JR 20:35
647  Mackenzie Landa FR 21:08
1,080  Carina Mendoza SR 21:38
1,181  Julianne Jacques JR 21:45
2,542  Meagan Paracholski SR 23:11
2,704  Lyndsie Etherton SR 23:26
2,828  Taylor Samson SO 23:39
3,151  Brittany Laygo SO 24:17
National Rank #138 of 341
West Region Rank #21 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 11.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Annemarie Schwanz Mackenzie Landa Carina Mendoza Julianne Jacques Meagan Paracholski Lyndsie Etherton Taylor Samson Brittany Laygo
Stanford Invitational 09/27 1153 20:36 21:15 21:21 21:35 23:17 23:32 23:39 24:41
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/18 1078 20:07 21:00 21:49 21:45 23:20
Mountain West Conference Championships 10/31 1217 21:04 21:14 22:10 21:39 23:07 23:55
West Region Championships 11/14 21:02 21:16 22:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.4 667 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.8 2.8 6.0 8.9 12.5 16.3 17.3 16.0 10.6 4.4 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Annemarie Schwanz 0.2% 129.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Annemarie Schwanz 49.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.4
Mackenzie Landa 93.1
Carina Mendoza 137.1
Julianne Jacques 146.6
Meagan Paracholski 239.0
Lyndsie Etherton 246.9
Taylor Samson 252.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 1.8% 1.8 18
19 2.8% 2.8 19
20 6.0% 6.0 20
21 8.9% 8.9 21
22 12.5% 12.5 22
23 16.3% 16.3 23
24 17.3% 17.3 24
25 16.0% 16.0 25
26 10.6% 10.6 26
27 4.4% 4.4 27
28 1.7% 1.7 28
29 0.7% 0.7 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0